Public court record archive
Independent coverage of litigation involving Lucid Bots, Inc.

Vendetta Cyber Defense LLC v. Lucid Bots, Inc.

Case No. 26CV036048-590 · General Court of Justice, District Court Division, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina

Vendetta Cyber Defense LLC, a Pennsylvania cybersecurity vendor, sued Lucid Bots, Inc. on in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina, alleging breach of a cybersecurity services contract billed at $3,085.00 per month. The complaint claims approximately $25,000 and demands a jury trial.

Key Facts

CourtGeneral Court of Justice, District Court Division, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Case number26CV036048-590
Filed
PlaintiffVendetta Cyber Defense LLC (Pennsylvania limited liability company)
DefendantLucid Bots, Inc. (North Carolina corporation)
ClaimsBreach of contract arising from a Master Services Agreement dated January 10, 2024 and a managed-services renewal dated November 14, 2025 ($3,085.00 per month)
Relief soughtApproximately $25,000; jury demand

Summary of the Allegations

The complaint alleges that Vendetta Cyber Defense LLC and Lucid Bots, Inc. entered a Master Services Agreement for cybersecurity managed services on January 10, 2024, and renewed the services on November 14, 2025 for a one-year term at $3,085.00 per month. According to the filing, the services included endpoint monitoring and threat detection and response.

The complaint alleges Lucid Bots failed to pay amounts due under the renewal, and seeks approximately $25,000 with a jury demand. These are contested allegations from the plaintiff's filing.

Documents

ComplaintFiled PDF · June 26, 2026 Register of ActionsPublic docket PDF · printed July 30, 2026

Quick Answers

Who is suing Lucid Bots in North Carolina?

Vendetta Cyber Defense LLC, a Pennsylvania cybersecurity vendor, sued Lucid Bots, Inc. on June 26, 2026, in the General Court of Justice, District Court Division, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina (Case No. 26CV036048-590).

What is the Vendetta Cyber Defense v. Lucid Bots lawsuit about?

The complaint alleges Lucid Bots, Inc. breached a cybersecurity Master Services Agreement dated January 10, 2024 and a one-year managed-services renewal dated November 14, 2025 priced at $3,085.00 per month, and failed to pay amounts owed. Approximately $25,000 is claimed, with a jury demand.

What court is the Vendetta Cyber Defense case in?

The complaint was filed in the General Court of Justice, District Court Division, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina, as Case No. 26CV036048-590 on June 26, 2026.

Full Text of the Complaint

This is a searchable transcription extracted from the court-filed PDF. PDF line wrapping and page artifacts have been normalized; source OCR errors may remain. The filed PDF is the authoritative copy.

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE

DISTRICT COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG

26-CVS-

26CV036048-590

VENDETTA CYBER DEFENSE LLC, Plaintiff, VS.

COMPLAINT

Jury Trial Demanded

LUCID BOTS, INC, Defendant.

NOW COMES Plaintiff, Vendetta Cyber Defense LLC, by and through undersigned counsel, complaining of the Defendant, Lucid Bots Incorporated, and says and alleges as follows:

FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

Vendetta Cyber Defense LLC ("Plaintiff") is a limited liability company organized and existing under the laws of the State of Pennsylvania that engages in business in North Carolina.

Lucid Bots, Inc ("Defendant") is, upon information and belief, a business corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of North Carolina.

Upon information and belief, at all times relevant hereto, Defendant engages in in business Mecklenburg County, North Carolina, with its principal place of business and registered mailing address located in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina.

The Court has jurisdiction over the parties in this matter.

Venue is proper in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. Defendant was properly served pursuant to Rule 4 of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure.

Upon information and belief, Defendant is an artificial intelligence robotics that company programs and produces drones for the exterior cleaning and construction industries.

On January 10, 2024, Plaintiff and Defendant entered a contract, the Master Services Agreement for Manages Services and Procurement Services: Terms and Conditions (the "MSA") whereby Plaintiff agreed to provide cybersecurity services (the "Services") to Defendant. On November 14, 2025, Plaintiff and Defendant entered an additional contract, the

Lucid Bots-Managed Services Renewal (the "Contract"), to renew the Services provided by Plaintiff for Defendant for a one-year term. Pursuant to the Contract, Plaintiff agreed to provide the following Services for Defendant to be billed monthly, for a total of$3,085.00 per month:

a. The Endpoint Basic platform to provide remote monitoring and management, and detection and responses to risks and threats; b. Managed Mobile Device Management to protect and manage mobile devices and Apple computers. c. Email Security to provide email protection and spam filters; d. Managed Detection and Response platform to provide 24/7 support and security; and e. Security Awareness Training to manage cybersecurity awareness and training for up to 100 employees. Pursuant to the Contract, Defendant agreed to pay Plaintiff for the Services for a one-year term, which were to be billed monthly as stated hereinabove.

Plaintiff has provided all monthly Services pursuant to the Contract, and remains ready, willing, and able to provide all Services through the one-year term.

Defendant received invoices and other documentation for the services rendered.

Pursuant to the MSA, if Defendant terminates Plaintiff's Services without cause, then Defendant shall pay Plaintiff an amount equal to the sum of the services charges for the remainder of the term as a cancellation fee. Since Plaintiff's February 2026 invoice to Defendant, and despite repeated requests from Plaintiff, Defendant is refusing to uphold its contractual obligation to pay for the sum of Plaintiff's monthly services through the remainder of the one-year term.

FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION

Breach of the Contract

Plaintiff adopts and incorporates the foregoing Paragraphs as if set forth verbatim

Plaintiff and Defendant entered the Contract for Plaintiffs Services for good and herein. valuable consideration. Plaintiff has satisfied all obligations imposed by the Contract, and remains ready

willing, and able to provide all Servies to fulfill their remaining contractual obligation for the oneyear term.

All conditions precedent for such work have been met, performed, waived, excused, or otherwise satisfied.

Plaintiff provided invoices and other documentation for payment to Defendant and requested payment for its Services pursuant to the Contract.

Defendant has failed to honor its contractual obligation and has breached the Contract by terminating Plaintiff's Services without cause and refusing to pay Plaintiff an amount equal to the sum of the service charges for the remainder of the one-year term. Asaresult of Defendant's failure and refusal to pay the balance of the amount owed

under the Contract, Plaintiff has suffered damages and is entitled to recover in the amount of TwentyFour Thousand Six Hundred and 80/100 Dollars ($24,680.00) for the sum of the services charges from March 2026 through October 2026, plus interest and reasonable attorney's fees and costs. As result of Defendant's failure and refusal to uphold its contractual obligation

the through one-year term, Plaintiff is entitled to recover in the amount of Twenty-Four Thousand Six Hundred and 80/100 Dollars ($24,680.00) for the sum of the services charges for the remainder of the term, to November 14, 2026 pursuant to the Contract, plus interest and reasonable attorney's fees and costs. Plaintiff is owed and is therefore entitled to a total judgment against Defendant in the

of Twenty-Four Thousand Six Hundred and 80/100 Dollars ($24,680.00), plus amount principal interest and reasonable attorney's fees and costs.

SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION

Unjust Enrichment

Plaintiff incorporates the foregoing Paragraphs by reference as if set forth verbatim

In the alternative, Defendant has become unjustly enriched at Plaintiff's expense.

Plaintiff conferred a non-gratuitous benefit in the form of cybersecurity services to herein. Defendant, for which it has not been compensated for.

The Services were provided at Defendant's request.

The reasonable value of Plaintiff's Services to Defendant is Twenty-Four Thousand Six Hundred and 80/100 Dollars ($24,680.00). Based on the circumstances and given the history of working together, Plaintiff reasonably relied upon Defendant for payment and Defendant knew or had reason to know that Plaintiff was relying upon them for payment.

Defendant's conduct induced Plaintiff to provide cybersecurity services to Defendant.

Defendant has realized substantial value from the Servies provided by Plaintiff. It would be inequitable for Defendant to retain the benefits received from Plaintiff's

Services without fully paying Plaintiff the value thereof. Plaintiff is therefore entitled to a judgment against Defendant in the principal amount of Twenty-Four Thousand Six Hundred and 80/100 Dollars ($24,680.00), plus interest and reasonable

attorney's fees and costs.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays unto the Court for judgment and relief as follows:

That Plaintiff have and recover an amount for $24,680.00 from Defendant for the sum of charges for the remaining one-year term;

That the costs of this action be taxed to the Defendant;

That Plaintiff have and recover its costs and expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees as allowed by law;

For a trial by jury on all issues so triable; and

For such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper. This the dy of June, 2026. Quite WOR Clay A. Campbell, NC Bar No. 38069 2200 E. 7" Street, Suite 100 Charlotte, North Carolina 28204 Telephone: 704.919.1519 Facsimile: 980.219.7025 Clay@yourncattorney.com Attorney for Plaintiff

Docket

Register of Actions Register of Actions

Case Summary Case Information Assignment Information Party Information

Causes of Action

Case Events Service Events Financial Information Add to My Cases

Mecklenburg District Court: 26CV036048-590

Case Summary Mecklenburg District Court Case Summary Case No. 26CV036048-590 Vendetta Cyber Defense LLC VS Lucid Bots, Inc Location: Mecklenburg District Court Location Mecklenburg District Court Filed on: 06/26/2026 Filed on 06/26/2026

Case Information Case Type: General Civil Action Case Status: 06/26/2026 Pending File Date 06/26/2026 Filed By Vendetta Cyber Defense LLC Filed Against Lucid Bots, Inc

Cause of Action

CV - Contract Description/Remedy Action

Assignment Information Current Case Assignment Case Number 26CV036048-590 Court Mecklenburg District Court Date Assigned 06/26/2026

Party Information PAGE 1 OF 4

Printed on 07/30/2026 at 2:49 PM

Mecklenburg District Court Case Summary Case No. 26CV036048-590

Plaintiff

Vendetta Cyber Defense LLC

Defendant

Lucid Bots, Inc c/o Andrew Ashur, as Registered Agent 6601-a Northpark Blvd Charlotte, NC 28216

House, Olivia Retained CAMPBELL, CLAY ANDERS Retained

Causes of Action

06/26/2026

Cause of Action CV - Contract

Filed By Vendetta Cyber Defense LLC Filed Against Lucid Bots, Inc Action Type Action

Case Events 07/08/2026 A document is available. Click here to view the document. Affidavit of Service Affidavit of Service Filed By: Plaintiff Vendetta Cyber Defense LLC Against: Defendant Lucid Bots, Inc Created: 07/08/2026 12:01 PM Index # 6 06/26/2026 A document is available. Click here to view the document.

Complaint

Complaint

Created: 06/26/2026 3:18 PM Index # 2 06/26/2026 A document is available. Click here to view the document. Civil Summons Civil Summons Created: 06/26/2026 3:18 PM Index # 3 06/26/2026 A document is available. Click here to view the document. Cover Sheet Cover Sheet Created: 06/26/2026 3:18 PM Index # 4 06/26/2026

Complaint

Created: 06/26/2026 3:16 PM Index # 1 PAGE 2 OF 4

Printed on 07/30/2026 at 2:49 PM

Mecklenburg District Court Case Summary Case No. 26CV036048-590

Service Events 07/01/2026 Civil Summons Lucid Bots, Inc served 06/26/2026 Civil Summons Requested by: Vendetta Cyber Defense LLC Lucid Bots, Inc Issued Anticipated Method: Certified Mail Serving Method: Certified Mail Created: 01/01/0001 12:00 AM

Financial Information Plaintiff Vendetta Cyber Defense LLC Total Financial Assessment 150.00 Total Payments and Credits 150.00 Balance Due as of 07/30/2026 0.00 06/25/2026 Transaction Assessment 150.00 06/25/2026 eFile Payment Receipt # 590-00481084 (150.00) © 2026 Tyler Technologies, Inc. | All Rights Reserved Version: 1.0.0.2608 © 2026 Tyler Technologies, Inc. | All Rights Reserved Version: 1.0.0.2608

JavaScript must be enabled in order for you to use this application. However, it seems JavaScript is either disabled or not supported by your browser. To use this application, enable JavaScript by changing your browser options, then try again.

Cookies must be allowed. Your browser is currently set to block cookies. Your browser must allow cookies before you can use this application. Cookies are small text files stored on your computer that tell this application when you're signed in. To learn how to allow cookies, see online help in your web browser.

You are using a web browser which this application no longer supports. We support the current and previous major releases of Google Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer, and Safari on a rolling basis. Each time a new version is released, we begin supporting that version and stop supporting the third most recent version.

Supported Browsers Chrome for Business

Firefox

PAGE 3 OF 4

Printed on 07/30/2026 at 2:49 PM

Mecklenburg District Court Case Summary Case No. 26CV036048-590

Internet Explorer

Apple Safari

Internet Explorer 9 Users Internet Explorer 11 launched on October 17, 2013, and as a result, we've discontinued support for Internet Explorer 9. Organizations that depend on old versions of Internet Explorer may want to consider a dual browser strategy. Print

PAGE 4 OF 4

Printed on 07/30/2026 at 2:49 PM